It’s about time someone filed a lawsuit against Cash4Gold. From everything that I’ve heard, their low payouts and questionable business practices were just begging for some disgruntled customer to call a lawyer and then have that lawyer realize that there might be a virtual pot-of-gold in a class action.

They really should have known better than to send that guy a check for just 15 cents after he sent them a couple hundred dollars worth of jewelry and, just in case you don’t believe me, you don’t have to look very far online to read a litany of complaints – a Google search for “complaints about cash4gold” returns almost 8,000 entries.

Tagged with:  






Welcome to the New Blog!

Just in case you missed it, there  is a five-year anniversary post over at the old blog that will officially close down as of today for new posts. It would have been reproduced here just like all the other posts over the last month that have been double-posted, but it seemed  to make better sense to make that the exception to the recent rule.

Hopefully, the old blog will just  stick around at Blogger for at least a few more years as I often refer back to it, particularly for juicy 2005-2006 housing bubble memorabilia – blogs are great tools to find out who said what and when they said it since most mainstream media websites tend to remove items after a few years.

Anyway, I’m happy to have completed this switch with no problems so far – WordPress is pretty cool and my experience has been everything that I was led to believe going in, that is, aside from the odd problem of inserting blank lines and a few other formatting idiosyncrasies. Overall, it’s been a pleasant experience.

I hope you’ll continue reading here at the new blog.

 

In a bit of irony that is quite appropriate for today, the five-year anniversary of this blog (more on that in an hour or so), it looks like the rental home in Southern California – where we spent more than three years during the middle of the last decade as the housing bubble reached its peak and where this blog was first written – is now up for sale.


If memory serves, the owners paid $555K for it in late-2003 while it was still under construction and we moved in not long after, following the sale of our house a mile away.

That was back in the days when homebuilders could, basically, do as little as possible and people would still come with their “loan pre-approval” papers to buy real estate.

In this case, there was no landscaping provided, no window coverings, and not much of anything else, so the owners must have put about $50K into it at the start, bringing their cost basis up to around the current asking price of $599K which is about what Zillow says its worth.

You probably shouldn’t feel sorry for the owners though. Not only are they very nice people but they own a ton of property in Santa Barbara and the only reason they bought this one was to do one of those tax exchange deals to reduce the tax owed on properties they sold up the coast where prices had gone parabolic.

I remember looking up houses in Santa Barbara on Realtor.com back then to see that you could get a 70-year old, 900 square foot two bedroom house – something like this – for about a million dollars. They’re about half price now, which still seems way too high.

Tagged with:  

Well, it looks like many more billions of dollars will be spent to aid the nation’s housing market in what is, in large part, an ultimately futile attempt to keep home prices above where the market would like to take them.

Freakishly low interest rates and $8,000 or more in tax credits for homebuyers apparently hasn’t done the trick, so the White House today is launching a new program to help homeowners who can’t afford to stay in their house by lowering payments through government subsidized financing and, in some cases, reducing mortgage balances.

Not long ago, a commenter here noted the following:

I feel that another leg down is inevitable. I also think the government will try to intervene which may keep us in limbo for longer than necessary. The end could come and we could get back to business in a more stable, albeit lower price level, market if the government would just get out of the way. It is much harder to sell or rent in a market that is still trending downward or where there is a lot of lingering doubt. If we could reach a bottom and have prices stabilize on their own for a few months without any government action, it would become obvious to all that the worst truly is behind us and then all the pent up buying could come back. But as long as the market is being propped up superficially, the skeptics will continue to wait on the sidelines making recovery impossible. We need to bottom and start over so we can develop business models that will work. With the government involved and more bad news waiting in the wings, it is impossible to make long-term plans. The economy will just have to wait until the government gets out of the way, IMHO.

Unfortunately, that doesn’t appear to be one of the options now being considered…

While I’m as sympathetic as anyone about a family down on their luck after job losses and a collapsing real estate market, this misplaced notion of the sanctity of homeownership and how people losing their houses to foreclosure is somehow such a terrible tragedy is ultimately doomed to make things much worse than they would otherwise be.

(more…)

Tagged with:  

More Gold for the Gold ETF

As compared to activity last year at this time it wasn’t much, but recent additions to the gold holdings at the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (NYSE:GLD) are certainly a move in the right direction if ETF demand is to again play any sort of major role in the gold market.


The “tonnes in the trust” rose by more than nine tonnes in just the last few days (circled in red) to 1125 tonnes, within striking distance of the all-time high set early last June at 1135 tonnes and then nearly equaled in late-December. The relative lack of ETF demand since the surge in early-2009 has been cause for concern and a new all-time high would certainly go a long way in allaying fears that investors have lost interest in this sector.

Full Disclosure: Long GLD at time of writing

Tagged with:  
 
© 2010-2011 The Mess That Greenspan Made