It’s kind of funny to think back to days of late-winter and early-spring when the braintrust at the nation’s central bank was debating whether it should raise short term interest rates before starting to sell some of its $1+ trillion hoard of mortgage-backed securities, sell some of the MBSes before raising rates, or do both a the same time.
Fast forward to summer and they’re debating how big Quantitative Easing II should be and some of the braintrust is already weighing in. According to this Reuters story, Dallas Fed President Richard “ninth inning” Fisher has cast an early vote for zero.
“People are uncertain — they are hoarding cash, they are holding back,” Fisher said, citing the complexity of the healthcare bill as a factor in making it difficult for corporations to project future costs.
“This is nothing to do with monetary policy — we have been as accommodative as possible,” he said. While the recovery has slowed, it is unlikely the U.S. will fall back into recession, he said.
The Fed does not need to buy more assets, and should be careful about “going too far,” he said, although not because of concerns over inflation, which he said is not an issue.
Buying more assets “could do damage by damaging our credibility,” he said. “There is plenty of liquidity in the system,” he said. “It will be utilized only if there’s confidence in the future.”
Just wait a couple months and, if the economy continues to weaken and Congress continues to balk at spending more borrowed money in advance of the fall elections, we’ll probably have an even bigger central bank money printing campaign than what we saw in 2009.
Those calls for the Fed’s balance sheet to reach $5 trillion may eventually be proven correct.
Recent Comments