A couple of items related to yesterday’s Bernanke’s Disingenuous Message to Savers come via this Reuters report that chronicles the difficulty older, fixed-income investors are having under Fed Chief Ben Bernanke’s policy of freakishly low interest rates and this item at The Aleph Blog that captures my sentiments fairly well.
Bernanke Does Not Understand Savings
Twice in his press conference yesterday, Bernanke showed that he was out of touch with average Americans. He argued that average people could keep up with a 2% increase in the price level by investing in stocks and (presumably short-term) bonds.(Speaking to The Bernank)
I’m sorry, Ben, but ya gotsta come down from the uneducated ivory tower and wallow in the mud wit da restov us. There are three problems with what you said:
- It’s hard to earn 2% (after-tax) consistently when the Fed funds rate is zero.
- Only the top 20% of the wealthy have enough assets to keep themselves afloat using the asset markets. Most people would like to do something to protect themselves from inflation, but lack the means to do so.
- Average people do not invest, they save at financial intermediaries like banks, S&Ls, and life insurers. Fed policy kills rates for savers. They will not become investors, because they lack the knowledge to do so.
I am again sorry, Ben, because your policies discriminate against the poor, and the lower middle class. Yes, the rich and the upper middle-class clever can escape the penalties stemming from your policies, but the lower-middle class and the poor can’t.
Think of it this way: your policies are making it more palatable for average people to buy gold, because the alternatives in savings are lousy. If there is no income, why not grab safety from inflation?
Author David Merkel then suggests a comparison to Arthur Burns, one of the worst Fed Chairman ever, a subject that will be taken up in the next item that appears here.



Bernanke Does Not Understand Savings





![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]](http://www.weblinks247.com/indexes/idx24_usd_en_2.gif)

This might just be the thing that really kicks the U.S. gold boom off.
Ten million people buying an ounce or two of gold because they think they might be better off putting that money into gold coins than in a bank – that’s like 500 tonnes of gold.
… and I mean 500 tonnes of gold THIS year…
Thanks for posting these articles on interest rates and savers. They are very interesting to me and reflect my primary focus in the financial markets.
I am a former banker and bankruptcy lawyer with a finance degree. I DO have the knowledge to “invest” and did so for many years. I stopped when I realized how fixed the markets are against the little guy. I am not willing to take on the kind of risk the markets represent today.
I have a significant nest egg from a lifetime of hard work, frugality and savings and am sick to death of 1% returns on long-term CDs because AG and now BB & Co. are desperately trying to inflate another bubble so debtors can continue their profligate ways.
I started investing in gold and silver bullion 3 years ago as a way to try to make up the shortfall. It’s great on paper so far but my gains could all disappear in an instant.
It is disgusting to watch our government virtually force prudent people into risky investments in order to encourage losers to borrow and spend in the hopes of delaying the inevitable day of debt reckoning. Without savings there is no capital formation and our country is doomed to a slowly declining standard of living as we produce less and less and shift more and more of our declining real GDP to debt service.
War against savers?
That depends what you mean by savers. If you mean individuals like you and me. Well of course. But if you mean corporations (which the Supreme Court now regard as real flesh and blood persons) than there is no war.
See, corporations are enjoying record profits. They save the vast profits, by the multi-trillion of dollars in a variety of ways not available to individuals. Such savings yield pretty good returns. But such good returns depend on extremely low interest rates. Such is the distortion that has been created during 2 decades of nuts-capitalism.
What BB decided is simply: corporate savings is more important than individuals. Because 75% of individuals are consumers – their lives is to consume, not save. Corporations must produce and sell and they need vast amount of savings (retained earnings) to do that. Now of course, that does not mean corporations should hire consuming customers to do their productions. Indeed, they must hire somebody else, real cheap labor, in order to achieve the profit in the fist place. But that’s not BB piece to worry. His only task is to make sure corporations make tons of profits, so that they will put the money into the banks. His banks, if you know what I mean.