REMINDER: All investment, economics, and finance related material now appears at the new IaconoResearch.com. For the time being at least, this has become a personal blog covering a variety of mostly unrelated topics.

How to Profit from Financial Market Reform

After all the commotion over the health care bill winds down, the financial market reform bill will probably take center stage next in Washington and this seems to be a pretty good summary of where things now stand.

From the Tom Toles collection at the Washington Post.

Tagged with:  






Among the many other less-than-desirable features of the  mortgage modification program known as HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program) is the revelation that, according to this AP report,  your credit score will probably be lowered soon after you apply for help.

For borrowers who are making their payments on time but are on the verge of default, the Obama administration’s loan modification program can reduce their credit score as much as 100 points. That makes it harder to get a loan and can present a problem when applying for a new job.

Housing counselors say it’s unfair, especially because the news often comes as a surprise to homeowners.

“Why should people’s credit be hurt even worse when they’re trying to do the right thing?” said Eileen Anderson, senior vice president at Community Development Corp. of Long Island, a housing counseling group in New York.

And many homeowners are angry that a program designed to help carries such a penalty, said Kathy Conley, a housing counselor with GreenPath Inc., a nonprofit group in Farmington Hills, Mich.

“It’s a feeling of being duped,” she said.

Apparently, Treasury Department guidelines require that mortgage companies notify credit bureaus at some early stage of the process, though it probably doesn’t say this on any of the HAMP application forms.

Of course, from the point of view of the credit agencies, this all makes good sense, however, it does seem like a double-standard. When the big banks got their big backing from the government when they ran into trouble, the ratings agencies thought that was swell, but, after the little guy gets his little bailout, his credit gets hit.

Tagged with:  

The Fed Must Disclose Bailout Details

It looks like the Federal Reserve has lost another round in court, prying eyes apparently moving one step closer to examining just what exactly is going on at the nation’s central bank according to this story at The Hill where, surely, there are much more important things going on today involving the health care bill.

Congressional lawmakers critical of the Federal Reserve are cheering a federal appeals court decision Friday compelling the central bank to disclose information about the financial bailout.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in New York on Friday ruled in favor of Bloomberg LP against the Federal Reserve System in a suit filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The suit has been a high-profile effort to obtain information from the Fed, which used broad powers to help stabilize the financial system during the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Trillions of dollars were extended to support financial institutions during the crisis, and lawmakers and other critics have sought more transparency from the central bank.

“The statute as written by Congress sets forth no basis for the exemption the Board asks us to read into it,” wrote Dennis Jacobs, chief judge on the court, regarding FOIA. “If the board believes such an exemption would better serve the national interest, it should ask Congress to amend the statute.”

The Federal Reserve lawyers (well paid, no doubt) are considering filing another appeal and will likely figure out some way of maintaining their secrecy.

Tagged with:  

Jon Stewart on Financial Market Reform

This seems to be showing up everywhere and, if you haven’t already seen it, it’s well worth ten minutes of your time if you’re in need of a good chuckle.


Quite a contrast with that last item

Tagged with:  

Did Bernanke Mean Supervision or Bailout?

Perhaps there is some context, somewhere, that makes yesterday’s words from Fed chief Ben Bernanke’s prepared remarks before the House Financial Services committee on the subject of the Fed’s role in bank supervision seem less filled with hubris than they first appear. But, if there is, I couldn’t find them.

The Federal Reserve is uniquely suited to supervise large, complex financial organizations and to address both safety and soundness risks and risks to the stability of the financial system as a whole.

The insights provided by our role in supervising a range of banks, including community banks, significantly increases our effectiveness in making monetary policy and fostering financial stability.

Maybe he’s confusing risk assessment and fostering stability with bailing out the big banks, something that the Fed chief has proven himself quite proficient at over the last few years.

If a few substitutions are made (in bold), this seems to make a whole lot more sense.

The Federal Reserve is uniquely suited to supervise bailout large, complex financial organizations and to address both safety and soundness risks and risks to the stability of the financial system as a whole future bailouts.

The insights provided by our role in supervising bailing out a range of banks, not including community banks, significantly increases our effectiveness in making monetary policy and fostering financial stability guaranteeing that there will be more bailouts.

Yes, that’s much better.

Econo-Limericks

A few economics-themed limericks spotted over at the WSJ economic blog this afternoon beginning with Fed chief Ben Bernanke:

“I’m afraid,” said Bernanke to Geithner,
“The debt crisis still has lots of bite in ‘er.
Though it may cause some ranklin’
I’ll print lots more Franklins:
We’ll loosen our money, not tighten ‘er!”

Said Bernanke, stroking his beard,
“This ‘-flation’ is worse than I feared;
All the research I see
Is pointing to ‘de-’;
It’s the ‘in-’ crowd that strikes me as weird.”

One called “Overheard at Goldman Sachs”:
“We assume that you know what you’re doing,
In this ill-advised trade you’re pursuing,
But the opposite bet
That we place on your debt
May eventually hasten your ruin.”

That last one is an instant classic. There are lots more at Limericks Economiques.

Tagged with:  
Page 33 of 35« First...1020303132333435
© 2010-2011 The Mess That Greenspan Made