Threes Across the Board

[Highlights from the spring of 2006 will be closed out today by looking at gasoline prices at the time, one of the more important trend changes of the last decade and, today, once again causing untold pain for many Americans, particularly those at lower income levels where energy costs are responsible for a larger share of their monthly budgets and these price increases are not offset by quality improvements in the iPad2, which, in addition to not being edible, won't power an automobile. Anyway, appearing on April 24th, 2006, the story below was a real novelty - three dollar a gallon gasoline. Recall that gas prices briefly topped that mark after the late-2005 hurricanes only to rise to the three dollar mark again six months later. What we wouldn't give for three dollar gasoline today...]

ooo

Last summer, when regular gasoline in this part of the country was about $2.70 a gallon, the first of its kind California SUV Fill Up Index was published at this blog. While the $2.80 and $2.90 marks came rather quickly, it has been over six months since the last update.

The three previous posts were here, here, and here, which ultimately led to some investigative reporting on the impact that high gas prices were having on vehicle sales.

A pledge was made early on to update the index with every ten cent rise in the price of gasoline, and after admittedly losing interest in recent months as prices dipped to a low of around $2.15, a recent surge to over $3 has necessitated dusting off the spreadsheet and plugging in the new figure to freshen up the rest of the data.

Not that $3 gas makes any difference to SUV owners in this part of the country.

Not that Ford Excursion drivers with stick figure representations of their seven member family (including two pets) on their rear window would compromise the lifestyle to which they’ve become accustomed for a nuisance such as making ends meet.

Why?

(more…)

Tagged with:  






Jake over at EconomPicData has come up with a rather stunning chart in this item from the other day following the release of the latest personal income/spending data from the Commerce Department. It seems that if you subtract government transfer payments from income, then the savings rate has been negative for quite some time now.

Recall that this follows news last week (as noted here) that government assistance is now at an all-time high and that wages as a share of income are at their lowest level since record keeping began in 1929. Somehow, none of this seems likely to change anytime soon.

Tagged with:  

The Problem with Humans

In addition to the many thoughts offered up about natural resources by Jeremy Grantham in his Q1 2011 letter in which he argues that this time might really be different -

Time to Wake Up: Days of Abundant Resources
and Falling Prices Are Over Forever (.pdf)

comes this observation about  humans in general that provides a brief diversion from what is otherwise a rather grim outlook for our collective future, price-wise.

As a product of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of years of trial and error, it is perhaps not surprising that our species is excellent at many things. Bred to survive on the open savannah, we can run quite fast, throw quite accurately, and climb well enough. Above all, we have excellent spatial awareness and hand eye coordination. We are often flexible and occasionally inventive.

For dealing with the modern world, we are not, however, particularly well-equipped. We don’t seem to deal well with  long horizon issues and deferring gratification. Because we could not store food for over 99% of our species’ career and were totally concerned with staying alive this year and this week, this is not surprising. We are also innumerate. Our typical math skills seem quite undeveloped relative to our nuanced language skills. Again, communication was life and death, math was not. Have you not admired, as I have, the incredible average skill and, perhaps more importantly, the high minimum skill shown by our species in driving through heavy traffic? At what other activity does almost everyone perform so well? Just imagine what driving would be like if those driving skills, which reflect the requirements of our distant past, were replaced by our average math skills!

We also became an optimistic and overconfident species, which early on were characteristics that may have helped us to survive and today are reaffirmed consistently by the new breed of research behaviorists. And some branches of our culture today are more optimistic and overconfident than others. At the top of my list would be the U.S. and Australia. In a well-known recent international test, U.S. students came a rather sad 28/40 in math and a very mediocre eighteenth in language skills, but when asked at the end of the test how well they had done in math, they were right at the top of the confidence list. Conversely, the Hong Kongers, in the #1 spot for actual math skills, were averagely humble in their expectations.

Obviously, there was a huge opportunity lost here when Grantham failed to comment on the skills of Asian drivers, perhaps drawing some broader conclusion that, while likely being politically incorrect, would possibly set some expectations for answering the question of  U.S. vs. China  dominance later in this century.

Tagged with:  

Still in a Depression?

Here’s another way to look at the Gallup survey data reported yesterday that generated many headlines in the mainstream media and elsewhere, all similar to the one provided by Gallup when they wrote “More Than Half Still Say U.S. Is in Recession or Depression”.

While the idea that more than half of Americans think the economy is still contracting almost two years after the recession ended is significant, what struck me is that few think we ever made the transition out of a depression. As indicated in blue above, from September 2008 to April 2011, this number only dropped from 33 percent to 29 percent

Wanna Buy Ron Paul’s House?

This item over at the Zillow Blog points to an online ad by Texas Congressman Ron Paul who, along with his wife, are selling their home in Lake Jackson, Texas after 42 years.

It doesn’t look like much from the front (see the photo at Zillow Blog) but it’s pretty big and has a nice pool in the back. The Paul’s are asking $325,000, however, the Zestimate is only $215,000, begging the question of whether anyone is really interested in paying six figures over the market value in order to sit in Ron Paul’s home office and think about Liberty or, alternatively, slide headfirst down into the swimming pool to dive for gold coins.

My guess is, yes.

Alarming Stat of the Day

Here’s another one of those statistics where you don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Consistent with the rising number of Americans on food stamps (now at almost 45 million and still rising), wages now make up the smallest share of income since record keeping began 82 years ago. This report in USA Today has all the details:

Americans depended more on government assistance in 2010 than at any other time in the nation’s history, a USA TODAY analysis of federal data finds. The trend shows few signs of easing, even though the economic recovery is nearly 2 years old.

A record 18.3% of the nation’s total personal income was a payment from the government for Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, unemployment benefits and other programs in 2010. Wages accounted for the lowest share of income – 51.0% -since the government began keeping track in 1929.

Total benefit payments are holding steady so far this year at a $2.3 trillion annual rate. A drop in unemployment benefits has been offset by rises in retirement and health care programs.

Americans got an average of $7,427 in benefits each in 2010, up from an inflation-adjusted $4,763 in 2000 and $3,686 in 1990. The federal government pays about 90% of the benefits.

Of course, with the economy still weak, now would be the absolute worst time to cut back on this government largess. Then again, the economy may never recover unless fundamental changes are made in how it operates, not the least of which would be a rethinking of the role of government and, naturally, the amount of money it borrows and spends.

Tagged with:  
© 2010-2011 The Mess That Greenspan Made