Is it just me, or is Goldman Sachs in 2006 starting to sound a lot like Enron in 2001? Not that the investment bank will soon implode,  but that revelations regarding how they profited at the expense of the little guy are just pummeling their reputation and efforts to fight back, however sound their arguments might be, just make them look worse.

Top Goldman executives are scheduled to testify before the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations this Tuesday about their role in the financial crisis in what should be another few days where the investment bank’s reputation sinks even lower.

Tagged with:  






Jon Stewart on Goldman Sachs

Jon Stewart of the Daily Show presents another in the series These F@#king Guys in which CNBC’s Jim Cramer does a pretty good imitation of one of The Village People

At about the 2:45 mark, you’ll hear some of the worst analogies for the Goldman Sachs fraud charges – antique car dealer, a nourishing meal, the Mets playing the Yankees, or a used car that may or may not be certified, to which Stewart replies, “Maybe you should explain it as if you’re a news show and your audience had not suffered a traumatic brain injury.”

Tagged with:  

Hedging the Goldman Outcome

There is no shortage of opinion as to how the fraud charges filed against Goldman Sachs by the Securities and Exchange Commission might pan out – here’s one more:

From the consistently wonderful Tom Toles archive and blog at the Washington Post.

Tagged with:  

Bill Black is Making Sense

You may have already seen Bill Black’s interview with Bloomberg before yesterday’s House Financial Services Committee hearing and then witnessed his “eye-popping” opening statement during which he lambasted the role of regulators during the housing and credit market bubble. Here he is in Michael Moore’s Capitalism, A Love Story.

From Black’s prepared testimony(.pdf) yesterday:

Lehman’s principal source of (fictional) income and real losses was making (and selling) what the trade accurately called “liar’s loans” through its subsidiary, Aurora … The FBI began warning publicly about the epidemic of mortgage fraud in 2004 (CNN).

That loss, however, may not be recognized for many years – particularly if the liar’s loans become so large that they help hyper-inflate a financial bubble. In the near-term, making massive amounts of liar’s losses loans creates a mathematical guarantee of producing record (albeit fictional) accounting income. As long as the bubble inflates, the liar’s loans can be refinanced – creating additional fictional income and delaying (but increasing) the eventual loss. The industry saying for this during the S&L debacle was: “a rolling loan gathers no loss.”

Kevin Black for Congress

This is a good follow-up to that last item about an economy based on lies and crony capitalism.  If elected to office, Kevin Black is likely to be the crony of many (hat tip BA).

Those of you with the most delicate of sensibilities might want to make sure the volume is at an appropriate level.

Tagged with:  

An Economy of Liars

After a stretch of time when you could find one or two commentaries every week on such topics as sound money, Austrian Economics, or just some good’ ol bashing of the Federal Reserve, the op-ed pages of the Wall Street Journal have been relatively devoid of this fare more recently, or so it seems. Gerald P. O’Driscoll of the Cato Institute begins to make up for that shortfall in this piece from today’s paper.

Free markets depend on truth telling. Prices must reflect the valuations of consumers; interest rates must be reliable guides for allocating capital across time; and a firm’s accounts must reflect the true value of the business. Rather than truth telling, we are becoming an economy of liars. The cause is straightforward: crony capitalism.

In the U.S today, we are moving away from reliance on honest pricing. The federal government controls 90% of housing finance. Policies to encourage home ownership remain on the books, and more have been added. Fed policies of low interest rates result in capital being misallocated across time. Low interest rates particularly impact housing because a home is a pre-eminent long-lived asset whose value is enhanced by low interest rates.

Distorted prices and interest rates no longer serve as accurate indicators of the relative importance of goods. Crony capitalism ensures the special access of protected firms and industries to capital. Businesses that stumble in the process of doing what is politically favored are bailed out, leading to moral hazard and more bailouts. And those losing money may be enabled to hide it by accounting chicanery.

If we want to restore our economic freedom and recover the wonderfully productive free market, we must restore truth-telling on markets. That means the end to price-distorting subsidies, which include artificially low interest rates. No one admits to preferring crony capitalism, but an expansive regulatory state undergirds it in practice.

Piling on more rules and statutes will not produce something different than it has in the past. Reliance on affirmative principles of truth-telling in accounting statements and a duty of care would be preferable. Deregulation is not some kind of libertarian mantra but an absolute necessity if we are to exit crony capitalism.

This is where I normally get lost with Libertarian arguments for even less regulation than we currently have, but, as I understand it, those calls normally assume a return to sound money and the end of the Fed as we know it which, when you think about it, makes a good deal of sense – restrict the expansion of money and credit and, with only a few exceptions, let people and businesses do what they want, letting the market sort it all out.

Page 20 of 26« First...101819202122...Last »
© 2010-2011 The Mess That Greenspan Made