The upcoming G20 meeting could be a bit more intriguing than usual (though, that wouldn’t be saying much) as it seems to have eclipsed the IMF gatherings and those of the G8 in importance for reasons that should be obvious – the developing world is playing a much bigger role in this economic “recovery” and would very much like to be heard.
Of course, many think that, instead of increasing the number after the “G”, it should be reduced – to two – as talks between just the U.S. and China might be more productive in curing some of the many global imbalances we see today. As evidenced by China’s rate hike announcement and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s pledge not to devalue the dollar earlier in the week, positions are being staked out as detailed in this report at Reuters:
The United States wants the Group of 20 countries to reduce global economic imbalances by committing to curb trade surpluses or deficits and by letting currencies rise more freely, a senior U.S. official said on Wednesday.
Ahead of weekend meetings of G20 finance ministers in Gyeongju, South Korea, the Treasury Department official made clear Washington wants currency values to be a focal point and sees current account levels as a vital part of the discussion.
China wasn’t mentioned by name but Beijing’s practice of managing the value of its yuan has angered the United States, which argues the currency’s low value is fostering global currency tensions.
“When large economies with undervalued exchange rates act to keep their currencies from appreciating, that compels other countries to do the same, setting off a dynamic of competitive nonappreciation,” the official said at a news briefing.
China in turn has argued U.S. policies are the root of strained currency relationships.
While it seems that they’ve been having this same debate for years, there is good reason for that – they have. Those looking for anything substantive from this gathering would be well advised to lower their expectations.
Recent Comments