The Worst May Not Yet Be Over

Those of you looking for some good bedtime reading might be interested in perusing the papers that were presented at the Federal Reserve’s Economic Symposium at Jackson Hole last weekend as summarized in this item over at FT Alphaville. Much to the dismay of economists around the world, the papers that are presented at the conference are not released to the general public until a few days after the conference is over, so the legions of dismal scientists who were not invited to the Fed confab are now having to play catch up.

While the last paper on the list, Eric Leeper’s Monetary Science, Fiscal Alchemy, makes a good argument for hubris being alive and well in Fed circles as one aspiring maker of monetary policy looks down his nose at those responsible for making fiscal policy (e.g., “monetary policy tends to employ systematic analytics, while fiscal policy relies on unsystematic speculation”), the  most important paper is most likely atop the list.

From half of the duo that produced “This Time Is Different” comes After the Fall by Carmen and Vincent Reinhart, a sobering view of how lost decades typically follow extended periods of reckless credit expansion and unchecked leverage. In this Financial Times op-ed, they commented on the goings on in Wyoming and how the worst may not yet be over.

Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, painted a sober but reassuring picture of US prospects. The basis for sustained recovery is in place, and canny Fed officials are now alive to the dangers of both deflation and inflation. Similarly Jean Claude Trichet, head of the European Central Bank, spoke about how the dust had begun to settle on the crisis. Policymakers and financial markets seem to be looking at what comes next.

Such optimism, however, may be premature. We have analysed data on numerous severe economic dislocations over the past three-quarters of a century; a record of misfortune including 15 severe post-second world war crises, the Great Depression and the 1973-74 oil shock. The result is a bracing warning that the future is likely to bring only hard choices.

They go on to detail what history says about the aftermaths of credit crises, arguing that what we’ve seen over the last decade was anything but “normal” and that anyone thinking we can return to something resembling that “normal” will be disappointed.

Rogers: Stop Printing Money

Long time commodity bull Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings, was on CNBC a short time ago and shared some thoughts about how the Fed should stop printing money and advised investors to bet against Ben Bernanke and his printing press rather than with them.

Nothing Bernanke has ever said has turned out to be right. Please go back and look up his record and you will see. The man just doesn’t understand economics. He doesn’t understand finance. He doesn’t understand currencies. All he understands is printing money. This is not going to work.

Lest you think this is just spouting off, see the classic clip Ben Bernanke Was Wrong.

Should the Fed Takes a Hike?

Considering that the weather forecast is for thunderstorms today and tomorrow in Jackson Hole, Wyoming and, aside from when it comes to operating a printing press, economists are not known as risk takers, the attendees of this year’s Federal Reserve confab may be inclined to avoid braving the elements, a decision that could result in more work than play.

It’s not clear whether that would be a particularly good thing or not as some (such as host Thomas Hoenig of the Kansas City Fed) now feel that the Fed might be doing more harm than good for the U.S. economy. The latest developments on the central bank’s group therapy session about  150 miles south of here are provided by the Wall Street Journal.

Economists still put low odds on the economy falling back into recession, but they acknowledge that the likelihood has been rising. Double-dip recessions are rare in history, sometimes the result of policy mistakes—such as pulling back stimulus too quickly or aggressively, as happened in the U.S. in the 1930s and in Japan in the 1980s. The most recent case of an economic relapse in the U.S. was the 1981-82 recession, which followed the 1980 downturn.

Mr. Bernanke’s speech signaled that the Fed’s position has shifted notably in the past few months. Early this year, officials spent much of their time planning an exit from easy money crisis policies, and unwound several of their emergency lending programs. Now, if the Fed takes any action, an easing of policy looks more likely than any tightening.

Fed officials disagree on whether more action is needed and whether the steps the Fed chairman outlined would be effective. The consensus-driven Fed chief is weighing the arguments among the dozen regional Fed bank chiefs and the four other Fed board members who have a say in Fed policy as he assesses whether to do more.

“None of the (Fed’s options) would move the needle significantly on either the economy or the risk of deflation,” Harvard professor Martin Feldstein said after the Fed chairman’s speech. Interest rates are already very low, he noted, but that has not generated much consumer or investment demand. “He’s in a bad spot.”

Yes, a bad spot it is… Sometimes you have to wonder where we’d be now if the government and its central bank had done nothing back in 2007 when the housing bubble first began to pop. Asking that question in a few more years will likely provide a clearer answer.

Bernanke Speaks, Markets Rise

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke certainly seems to have figured out how to dole out bits and pieces of what markets seem to want to hear, namely, that the central bank is ready, willing, and able to crank up the printing press in order to keep asset prices aloft under the broad cover of fighting deflation. Today’s speech at the Fed confab in Jackson Hole, Wyoming offers another good example.

Notwithstanding the fact that the policy rate is near its zero lower bound, the Federal Reserve retains a number of tools and strategies for providing additional stimulus. I will focus here on three that have been part of recent staff analyses and discussion at FOMC meetings: (1) conducting additional purchases of longer-term securities, (2) modifying the Committee’s communication, and (3) reducing the interest paid on excess reserves. I will also comment on a fourth strategy, proposed by several economists–namely, that the FOMC increase its inflation goals.

Falling into deflation is not a significant risk for the United States at this time, but that is true in part because the public understands that the Federal Reserve will be vigilant and proactive in addressing significant further disinflation. It is worthwhile to note that, if deflation risks were to increase, the benefit-cost tradeoffs of some of our policy tools could become significantly more favorable.

Second, regardless of the risks of deflation, the FOMC will do all that it can to ensure continuation of the economic recovery. Consistent with our mandate, the Federal Reserve is committed to promoting growth in employment and reducing resource slack more generally.

That last part in bold is probably what has buyers of everything but Treasuries bidding prices higher since, as the $2.3 trillion Fed balance sheet has ably demonstrated, the phrase “all that it can” means trillions more dollars being summoned for the greater good.

The Pause that Refreshes

The Commerce Department did its job by publishing a better-than-expected downward revision to economic growth in the second quarter and stock futures are rising. Now, it’s up to Fed Chief Ben Bernanke with today’s other market-moving news, a speech to be delivered at the Fed’s Economic Symposium in Jackson Hole. Reuters offers this preview:

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will have to address a number of pressing issues in a speech on Friday as investors search for more clarity on how close the central bank might be to another asset-buying spree to support the flagging recovery.

Bernanke will also likely touch on fears of waning economic momentum as evidenced by a parade of gloomy indicators, suggesting the U.S. economy has slowed to a crawl when he speaks at the Fed’s annual retreat in the Teton mountains.

He may also note the Fed’s decision earlier this month to renew purchases of assets to replace ones that have rolled off the Fed’s balance sheet.

But he seems unlikely to offer any detailed plan of what the U.S. central bank will do going forward or to define what would trigger more aggressive steps by the Fed.

That could be a problem…

Tagged with:  

In an interview with Kitco News, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) said that he plans to introduce legislation next year that will allow for the auditing of U.S. gold reserves, said reserves believed to exist (though it’s not clear how much has been leased out and when it’s due back) but not properly counted in some time (since the Eisenhower Administration).

Paul dropped the news in the interview, indicating that the bill still does not have an official name yet but will be unveiled at the start of the new U.S. Congress.

“If there was no question about the gold being there, you think they would be anxious to prove gold is there,” he said of the Federal Reserve.

This is not the first time the congressman has made his pitch. “In the early 1980s when I was on the gold commission, I asked them to recommend to the Congress that they audit the gold reserves – we had 17 members of the commission and 15 voted no to the audit,” said Paul. “I think there was only one decent audit done 50 years ago,” he said.

Though Paul did not say whether there is any truth to claims that there is no gold in Fort Knox or the New York Federal Reserve, he said, “I think it is a possibility.”

“If we ever get around to deciding we should use gold in relationship to our currency we ought to know how much is there,” said Paul. “Our Federal Reserve admits to nothing and they should prove all the gold is there. There is a reason to be suspicious and even if you are not suspicious why wouldn’t you have an audit?” he said.

Paul also offers a few thoughts on the Federal Reserve (abolish it), the use of gold and silver as legal tender (he’s for it), which new regulations he’d get rid of (all of them), and the U.S. economy (no double-dip recession, just one big single-dip).

Tagged with:  
Page 1 of 171234510...Last »

IMAGE

© 2010 The Mess That Greenspan Made