Forty years ago today, President Richard M. Nixon “closed the gold window”, forever severing the link between paper money and precious metals, or so they thought at the time.
With the gold price having risen from under $40 an ounce to over $1,800 an ounce during those four decades – an annualized gain of almost 15 percent per year – it increasingly looks as though the days of a pure fiat money system are numbered, a case made by many of the stories below that celebrate mark today’s anniversary.
• The Nixon Shock -Bloomberg/BusinessWeek
• The Nixon Shock Heard ‘Round the World – WSJ
• Nixon’s not-so-happy gold legacy 40 years on – Mineweb
• Nixon Showed What Not to Do in an Economic Crisis – Bloomberg
• August 15, 1971: President Nixon’s Golden Error – Real Clear Markets
• August 15, 1971: A Date Which Has Lived In Infamy – Forbes
• We are now paying for abandoning the gold standard – Telegraph
• Road to downgrade began 40 years ago – Des Moines Register
• Gold Standard or Nixon Standard – Lew Rockwell
• Gold-standard debate back, 40 years after Nixon – MarketWatch
• Gold Standard: Forty Years Gone — And Good Riddance – WSJ
• Nixon’s Colossal Monetary Error: The Verdict 40 Years Later – Forbes
• 50-Fold Gain for Gold Price 40 Years After Gold Standard Ends – Bullion Vault
• Fiat Money: The Root Cause Of Our Financial Disaster – Forbes
• Forty Years of Paper Money – WSJ
Along with the Wikipedia entry Nixon Shock, Roger Lowenstein’s treatment atop the list above should be considered required reading. I’m still working my way down through the rest of these items and may have a few thoughts of my own to offer later in the day.
Until then, I wonder what Milton Friedman would think today after the financial market turmoil and the remarkable rise in the gold price during the fourth decade after he thought freely floating fiat currencies would be such a good idea.



Recall that, yesterday, the Fed fired off the first of a possible three shots that could be seen prior to what some analysts predict will be another $1 trillion or so in outright money printing to buy government debt or some other asset that, if all goes well, would goose the markets for another six months or so, just like it did last year.
By promising to keep rates low “at least through mid-2013″ in the policy
They will probably tip their hand at further easing in some form (lest today’s rebound rally quickly turn into a dead cat bounce), but fall well short of offering any explicit support, which, in the end might not be such a good idea because, as we saw almost exactly a year ago, financial markets require intervention like a drug addict needs drugs – just words just won’t do.




![[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]](http://www.weblinks247.com/indexes/idx24_usd_en_2.gif)

Recent Comments