Falling Energy Prices Push Inflation Lower

The Labor Department reported that, due largely to falling energy prices, consumer prices fell 0.2 percent in March after an increase of 0.7 percent in February. On a year-over-year basis, the government’s official measure of inflation now stands at just 1.5 percent, an eight month low, down from 1.7 percent as reported a month ago.

Paced by a 4.4 percent drop in the gasoline prices, the energy index fell 2.6 percent last month after jumping 5.4 percent in February and it is now down 1.6 percent from a year ago. Food prices were flat last month, now up 1.5 percent on a year-over-year basis.

(more…)

Tagged with:  






A Bitcoin Primer

Money printing on a grand scale from the Bank of Japan, soaring stock prices around the world, and plunging precious metals prices are topping the financial news headlines this morning, but another story that is getting an increasing amount of attention is the remarkable rise in the value of Bitcoins, the world’s most popular virtual currency.

Here’s a 90-second primer on the subject from a story in today’s Washington Post:

Here’s an interesting data point…

At about the one minute mark, it is noted that the market value of all Bitcoins is about $275 million. That may sound like a lot of money (and, of course, it is), but, assuming a five-day work week and an eight hour day at the Federal Reserve, that’s about the same amount of money that the U.S. central bank creates every 30 minutes!

Tagged with:  

A Bad Idea Whose Time Has Come

One of the impacts that I hadn’t previously considered of switching from the standard CPI (Consumer Price Index) to the Chained-CPI (that consistently produces lower numbers) as part of a sneaky way to cut government benefits without calling it such is that tax collection will fall (all else being equal) since the tax tables are linked to the rate of inflation.

This story at USA Today fills in some of the details:

The switch to chained CPI wouldn’t just reduce benefits, including Social Security and Veterans’ benefits, but could also impact future federal tax rates paid by most people.

Various news reports have stated that the Obama administration plans to include cuts to Social Security benefits in its budget proposal. What is less frequently communicated is that such cuts would likely be accompanied by tax increases on the middle class, in violation of one of President Obama’s campaign promises to not increase taxes on those earning under $250,000 per year. These cuts would also impact retirement and disability benefits for veterans.

Many commentators and pundits will described the tax increases and cuts to Social Security and other benefits as a “tweak,” or “technical change,” an “adjustment” or, slightly more honestly, a “gimmick.” This is because the reported proposal will involve changing the calculation of the annual cost of living increase, one measure of inflation, by switching to a new formula known as “chained CPI” (chained Consumer Price Index). Supporters argue that this is simply a more accurate way to calculate changes in the cost of living over time.

Of course, it’s far less accurate in calculating the cost of living for retirees receiving benefits in the form of social security since they buy more of the stuff that’s going up in price (e.g., medical care), but that’s what passes for bipartisan policy making in Washington these days.

I suppose the logical next step here on our road to fiscal reform is to come up with a third version of the CPI that reads consistently higher than either the existing CPI or the chained-CPI for purposes of tax collection.

Tagged with:  

Energy Prices Drive Consumer Prices Higher

The Labor Department reported that, paced by the surging cost of energy products, consumer prices in the U.S. jumped 0.4 percent last month and, on a year-over-year basis, inflation was unchanged at 2.9 percent.

Consumer Price Index

Gasoline prices surged 6.0 percent in February and are now up 12.0 percent from a year ago as the energy index jumped 3.2 percent, now 7.0 percent higher on a year-over-year basis. Falling natural gas prices offset rising heating oil costs as the overall household energy index fell 0.6 percent last month and is down 0.3 percent from last year at this time.

(more…)

Tagged with:  

In advance of tomorrow’s report on consumer prices that has the potential to offer a few surprises given the recent surge in the cost of gasoline, clothing, and other essentials, Amity Shlaes files this report at Bloomberg about how inflation has a way of coming about suddenly and, once it does, can be very difficult to stop.

A little is all right. That’s the message Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has been giving out recently when asked about the evidence of inflation in the U.S. recovery.

BloombergSometimes Bernanke doesn’t even go that far. He simply says he doesn’t see inflation. The Fed chairman recently described the prospects for price increases across the board as “subdued.”

“Sudden” is more like it. The thing about inflation is that it comes out of nowhere and hits you. Monetary policy is like sailing. You’re gliding along, passing the peninsula, and you come about. Nothing. Then the wind fills the sail so fast it knocks you into the sea. Right now, the U.S. is a sailboat that has just made open water, and has already come about. That wind is coming. The sailor just doesn’t know it.

“Sudden” has happened to us before. In World War I, an early version of what we would call the CPI-U, the consumer price index for urban areas, went from 1 percent for 1915 to 7 percent in 1916 to 17 percent in 1917. To returning vets, that felt awful sudden.

History has other examples. In 1945, all seemed well: Inflation was 2 percent, at least officially. Within two years that level hit 14 percent.

All appeared calm in 1972, too, before inflation jumped to 11 percent by 1974, and stayed high for the rest of the decade, diminishing the quality of life for whole cohorts.

The fact that financial repression is now official government/central bank policy and that it’s been more than a generation since we’ve seen high official rates of inflation in the U.S. will surely make dealing with rising prices even more difficult this time around.

Also, this ominous warning was offered:

The greater the denial before, the faster the inflation accelerates after.

Yikes! Suddenly, tomorrow’s CPI report seems a whole lot more interesting…

On “Flexible Inflation Targeting”

In the years ahead we’ll probably hear a lot more about the Federal Reserve’s new “flexible inflation targeting” approach as it relates to their deliberations on monetary policy and this Bloomberg story by Fed watcher Craig Torres gives us a preview of what we’re likely to hear this spring, that is, if gasoline prices wind up where nearly every analyst thinks they’ll be.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke spent six years pushing for an inflation goal. Now that he has it, some investors are betting he’ll breach the 2 percent target in the short run to lower unemployment.

The Fed chairman told lawmakers last week that an increase in energy costs will boost inflation “temporarily while reducing consumers’ purchasing power.” He also said the central bank will adopt a “balanced approach” as it pursues its twin goals of price stability and full employment, which it defines as a jobless rate of between 5.2 percent and 6 percent.

“The chairman seemed to suggest they will tolerate a misdemeanor on inflation as unemployment continues to fall toward their goal” over several years, said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital, a hedge fund that manages $250 million in Washington.

Policy makers at a March 13 meeting probably won’t deviate from their commitment to hold interest rates close to zero at least through late 2014, even if their forecast shows a burst of energy-driven inflation, said Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP LLC in Jersey City, New Jersey. They’ll probably be more concerned that rising prices will hold back real spending, impeding growth and improvement in the job market, he said.

“The chairman said, ‘We think it is transitory, we are sticking to our guns, we are going to focus on the drag on income,’” Crandall said. Bernanke explained how under a strategy of flexible inflation targeting, “a temporary spike in the price indexes can be a reason for the central bank to be more generous rather than less,” Crandall said.

What’s funny – well, that is, unless you happen to be a senior living on a fixed income – is that the Fed’s own projections for unemployment paint a pretty grim picture of what the U.S. labor market will look like going forward, meaning that, this “flexible approach” to balancing their stable prices/low unemployment mandate is likely to result in higher inflation, perhaps much higher inflation.

Page 1 of 23123451020...Last »
© 2010-2011 The Mess That Greenspan Made