In my visit back to Pennsylvania last week the subject of reverse mortgages came up on several occasions as more and more seniors have little recourse other than to tap their home equity in order to pay, primarily, medical bills. Long-term care costing upwards of $10,000 a month (i.e., after the three months that Medicare pays) will quickly wipe out whatever savings most elderly have, leaving them with few alternatives other than a reverse mortgage that, surprisingly, are now taken out as a lump sum by a margin of two-to-one.

Until reading this Wall Street Journal story, I didn’t even realize it’s possible to default on these loans, but, clearly it is, and those default rates are on the rise, but help is on the way.

Defaults occur when a borrower fails to pay property charges, including property taxes and homeowners insurance. Of the almost 600,000 reverse mortgages outstanding, 9.8% are currently delinquent, up from 8% in 2011, the first year for which statistics are available, according to the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, whose Federal Housing Administration insures virtually all reverse mortgages.

Delinquencies have increased in recent years as up to 70% of borrowers have opted for lump-sum payouts.

“For many homeowners, taking all eligible cash upfront results in insufficient cash flow in later years for property upkeep, taxes and insurance,” HUD warned in a November report to Congress.

The good news: Help is available. Under guidelines HUD released in 2011, lenders—before initiating foreclosure proceedings—are required to notify borrowers who fall behind of free financial counseling. Such sessions can help them get back on track by, among other things, tapping benefit programs for some older individuals.

I haven’t seen any data on this recently, but reverse mortgages have got to be a booming business for banks with, as I recall, some very big up-front fees.

Tagged with:  






The Retirement Gamble

A new Frontline documentary premiered last night dubbed The Retirement Gamble and, as is the case for anything Frontline produces, it is well worth a look as it sheds some much needed light on the retirement industry and mutual funds with high fees.

Watch The Retirement Gamble on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

The gist of the story is that fees are high, hard to figure out, and oftentimes not disclosed to people who, basically, have no choice other than their employers’ 401k plan where managed funds with high expense ratios are pushed rather than low-cost index funds.

Tagged with:  

Retirement Confidence At Record Lows

Some highlights from the Employee Benefits Research Institute’s Retirement Confidence Survey in which we find Americans as ill-equipped as ever to enter their golden years:

Many workers report they have virtually no savings and investments. In total, 60 percent of workers report that the total value of their household’s savings and investments, excluding the value of their primary home and any defined benefit plans, is less than $25,000.

Although 56 percent of workers expect to receive benefits from a defined benefit plan in retirement, only 33 percent report that they and/or their spouse currently have such a benefit with a current or previous employer.

That second one is kind of a shocker, that is, unless those 23 percent of respondents who said there were going to receive a pension but didn’t have a pension retirement plan thought they were being asked about social security.

And this chart says a lot about how the fortunes of aspiring retirees are changing:

Retirement Confidence

That area circled in red has gone from around 50 percent to 60 percent over the last ten years and will likely continue to go higher in the years ahead as long as Ben Bernanke is running the Federal Reserve and savers continue to be punished.

Tagged with:  

Not Redefining Rich

The first part of this Gallup survey addresses the level of annual income Americans would need to consider themselves “rich”, a question that, at least by most definitions of the word (i.e., relating to wealth, not income), doesn’t make sense. But, the second poll asking what net worth would be required to qualify as “rich” had more interesting results:

A surprising 74 percent of those polled think that, if you’ve reached the one million dollar mark you are “rich” and, even more surprisingly, this hasn’t changed in seven years since the last time this survey was conducted.

It strikes me that, either one of these polls was somehow flawed or people really don’t understand what has been happening to their money – even using the government’s dubious inflation statistics, $1 million in 2003 is now worth almost $1.25 million today, meaning that there should have been a sizeable shift upward in the survey results.

Tagged with:  

For Retirement, 80 is the new 65?

In another sign that Americans are ill-prepared to enjoy what have always been thought of as “golden years”, according to a new Wells Fargo survey, some 25 percent of aspiring middle class retirees don’t think they’ll be able to quit working until they’re 80 years old.

The concept of a “retirement age” is going the way of the typewriter, another 20th-century relic that has been made irrelevant by changing circumstances. Middle class Americans now expect to work until they have saved enough to afford to retire, according to results from the seventh annual Retirement Survey from Wells Fargo & Company.

Three fourths (76%) of the 1,500 middle class Americans surveyed by telephone by Harris Interactive in August and September 2011 say it is more important to have a specific amount saved before retirement, regardless of age, while only 20% say it is more important to retire at a specific age, regardless of savings.

The survey also found:

• A quarter (25%) of middle class Americans say they will “need to work until at least age 80” to live comfortably in retirement
• Three-fourths (74%) of middle class Americans expect to work in their retirement years, including 39% of all respondents who will need to work to make ends meet or maintain their lifestyles, while 35% say they will work because they want to, rather than out of financial need.
• Among middle class Americans age 40 to 59, 54% say they will “need to work,” compared to 34% of those age 25 to 39. Accordingly, only 25% of those between the ages of 40 and 59 say they will work in retirement because they “want to,” versus 45% of Americans between the ages of 25 and 39.

There’s lots more thoroughly depressing data in this survey, not the least of which is that almost 40 percent of respondents have “no fears” about retirement because “it will work itself out”. For about 90 percent of this group, it probably won’t.

Also, Americans have saved only $25,000 of an estimated $350,000 they’ll need to retire comfortably with almost a third of those in their 60s having saved less than $25,000.

Tagged with:  

Touching the Third Rail

A quick survey of what cartoonists have been thinking about lately reveals that Governor Rick Perry’s comments on how social security is a Ponzi scheme have been quite popular.

From the Signe Wilkinson archive at the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Tagged with:  
Page 1 of 512345
© 2010-2011 The Mess That Greenspan Made